Menu
American Trade Association of Cannabis and Hemp
    • Home
    • Our Mission
    • Newsroom
    • Board of Directors
    • Events
    • Contact
    Close Menu
    durban-posion-cbd-hemp-flower-min
    August 26 2020

    CBD advocates warn new federal rule could cripple industry

    News

    Cannabis law experts and industry advocates are raising alarms that a new rule issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration could cripple the burgeoning CBD industry by essentially criminalizing the manufacturing process.

    “To take something like this literally would mean that the industry just doesn’t exist,” said Rod Kight, a cannabis law expert, who has written detailed concerns about the regulations. “The DEA keeps refusing to release its grip on this plant, regardless of what Congress says.”

    What exactly is the DEA proposing? Last week, the agency released an interim final rule, which takes effect immediately, addressing the legalization of hemp under the 2018 farm bill. It portrayed the regulations as a benign piece of housekeeping.

    “This interim final rule merely conforms DEA’s regulations to the statutory amendments to the CSA that have already taken effect, and it does not add additional requirements to the regulations,” the summary states.

    But industry experts say that the actual details could have far-reaching implications. The biggest issue is related to the THC level of hemp extract that is used to create CBD products. Under the 2018 farm bill, legal hemp plants and products must have a THC potency level below 0.3 percent. But the DEA’s new rule states that hemp derivatives also can’t exceed 0.3 percent. Otherwise, they are deemed a Schedule I controlled substance and subject to federal criminal penalties.

    That’s problematic because the CBD manufacturing process almost always involves some stage in which the THC potency level rises above 0.3 percent. That potentially means that producers are violating federal law even if the plants they use and their finished products have THC levels below the legal federal threshold.

    “It’s almost impossible, if not downright impossible, to produce any cannabinoid products without at some stage the THC levels exceeding the 0.3 percent,” Kight said.

    What are the immediate effects? That remains difficult to parse. Hemp advocates are inclined to take a dark view of the DEA’s intentions.

    “The DEA for decades has been a four-letter word for our industry. There is a lot of skepticism,” said Jonathan Miller, general counsel for the U.S. Hemp Roundtable. “The reaction from a large part of the industry is that, ‘Oh, this is the DEA trying to get back in and start threatening legal businesses.’”

    But even if the DEA has no intention of raiding businesses and charging CBD producers with crimes, industry advocates say the legal cloud could further hinder a fledgling market that’s already hamstrung by regulatory uncertainty.

    “Is it going to make it harder in terms of business banking, investment and insurance?” asked Michael Bronstein, president of the American Trade Association for Cannabis and Hemp. “If the rule is applied or interpreted in certain ways, it could become problematic for the way other businesses do business with the industry.”

    What does the DEA say? Spokesman Sean Mitchell said the interim final rule was issued to make sure that the agency’s regulations comply with the 2018 farm bill. He reiterated that any substance with a THC level above 0.3 percent is considered marijuana and classified as a Schedule I narcotic.

    “DEA is aware of the concerns of the CBD industry and is currently in the process of evaluating policy options,” Mitchell said.

    He further suggested that raiding CBD manufactures isn’t among the agency’s priorities.

    “We’re in the midst of an opioid epidemic. There is a very, very strong resurgence of methamphetamines,” he said. “DEA is focusing its resources and attention on the Mexican cartels that are bringing those and other deadly substances into our country.”

    What happens next? Even though the interim final rule takes effect immediately, there is a 60-day comment period, and industry advocates intend to raise their concerns with the DEA through that process.

    But they also hope to spur action by lawmakers, who are likely to be concerned that the agency’s actions could stifle an industry that they’ve sought to bolster. Some key lawmakers — most notably Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — have been champions of the hemp industry, arguing that it will be a financial boon for struggling farmers.

    But industry advocates also are considering litigation. They think there could be both procedural and substantive grounds for challenging implementation of the interim final rule.

    “At this stage of the game, I can’t really say much,” Kight said. “But there’s rapidly gathering momentum.”

    To view online click here.

    Canada, US business groups to support global cannabis industry expansion Professional Sports & CBD: The Journey Ahead

    Related Posts

    atach-beverage-council-slide

    News

    ATACH Forms Cannabis Beverage Council Aimed at Expanding Canna-Drinks Segment

    joe-biden-marijuana

    News

    Biden Transition Team Highlights Top Health Pick’s Medical Marijuana Work

    Atach Statement - Levine

    News

    Statement on Joe Biden Selecting Pennsylvania’s Dr. Rachel Levine as Assistant Secretary of Health:

    Use discount code
    ATACHHempFB50
    & save $50.00 on your purchase!

    Marijuana Legalization - Join the Cannabis Voter Project

    Recent Posts

    • ATACH Forms Cannabis Beverage Council Aimed at Expanding Canna-Drinks Segment
    • Biden Transition Team Highlights Top Health Pick’s Medical Marijuana Work
    • Statement on Joe Biden Selecting Pennsylvania’s Dr. Rachel Levine as Assistant Secretary of Health:
    • Michael Bronstein To Talk Federal Cannabis Policy with the Nevada Dispensary Association
    • Report Language in the Omnibus Appropriations Bill Provides Hope for Hemp Processors, Aligning with ATACH’s Responsive Comments to the USDA IFR

    Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • February 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • January 2018
    • June 2017
    • November 2016
    • July 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • November 2015
    • July 2015
    Back To Top
      © American Trade Association of Cannabis and Hemp 2021